
David Cole of DFC Intelligence notes: "The PS3 has all kinds of software support, billions of dollars in backing, a well known brand name, they are able to do marketing and it sold more units in its first few days on the market than the 3DO did in the 3 years or so it was on the market. PS3DO sounds cute and catchy, but as an actual basis for comparison it is pretty useless."
Michael Pachter of Wedbush Morgan Securities also agrees: "It's a pretty stupid (and unfair) comparison," he said. "3DO was a new platform, no brand ID, not compatible with legacy software, and with no first or third party support. The PS3 has a great brand, a loyal customer base, is generally backward compatible, has a ton of third party support, and an ever-increasing number of good first party titles. I hope the industry veteran was kidding. If he was serious, he's a fool."
A fool, indeed. To see what the creator of 3DO has to say, check out GameDaily's complete feature.
1. On some levels it's a pretty fair comparison. Fanboy expectations and Sony hyperbole vs. reality ring true.
Sales are not up to expectations.
Quantity and quality of games are not up to expectations.
Priced too expensive in the marketplace.
Being beaten by it's competitors.
Yeah, sounds like the 3D0 to me -- which BTW I bought when it was released.
Posted at 2:51PM on Oct 1st 2007 by Jas