PS3 Fanboy

There is one problem with "seeing the light" - once people are invested into one system, it's not always easy to just switch over to a more expensive alternative. This is especially true if you have a group of friends that are all using the same system.

MS beat Sony to market, and gained quite a chunk of market share before the console race even began. They offered features out of the box that Sony is just now close to copying. They are still selling at a significantly lower price point. Their hardware reliability has increased greatly since the early 360 models...

What does this all mean? That seeing the 360 and PS3 systems reach parity isn't a good enough reason for most people to jump ship and change brands. Sony needs to continue upping their game, finding ways to innovate and improve the system, and (most importantly) releasing great exclusive games.

A good article, but I think that there is still a long road ahead for Sony this generation.

Xbox360 owners seem slow to learn. The reason for this is because these are the same points that us first generation PS3 owners knew of and argued on even before the launch of the PS3.

After nearly two years, this guy finally learns that 2+2=4. Finally, he learns what we've already learned. Too bad we're now advancing towards Calculus and he's still on arithmetics, counting with his fingers, like most xbox360 owners.

@ Secret

Come back to me once the PS3 supports custom soundtracks for ALL games, Cross game chat for ALL games, Trophies for ALL games, when the 2.40 update doesn't cause 'RROD' for some users and when people in Europe can play online against Americans... Then the PS3 will be able to do everything the 360 has been able to do since its launch 3 years ago...

Plus trophies will never reach the level of the 360's gamerscore system if Sony doesn't open it up. Gamerscore is a huge success because of the community that has built up around it, with sites x360a.com, MGC.net, 360Voice.com, etc. If Sony doesn't embrace that community love, then the whole Trophy system is a bit of a waste.

@ejamer

Even though the Xbox 360 beat the PS3 to the market, look at how many games they share. Imagine if all of those companies started shifting towards PS3-exclusiveness. I remember hearing reports that Rockstar was going to shift to being mostly ps3-exclusive after they created GTA4. Ubisoft didn't seem to be too happy about the 360's lack of disk space either while creating Assassin's Creed. With the current cost to make video games, they're always going to share a ton of games, but the gap between the two might widen soon and look similar to the previous generation.

You're right about the price, though. I don't see Sony dropping their prices until Christmas maybe. And with a recession, people won't want to pay the extra $100 even if it's better. That's why the PS3 is rising in Europe and Japan more so than in the US.

@ ejamer

well said

um..... the first one worked. dont blame the site.

This one is an ID-10T error.

@ J

when someone complains about somethign not working is because when the page refreshed it wasnt there. Did u ever think of that or did common sense escape u?

um, no. ps3fanboy is a major offender in terms of "dropping" posts. Think Fox News. But ps3fanboy is all we have. If Fox news was all we had, you would have to learn to read between the lines. And so we do.

In a perfect world, games would be the only thing that matters. However, the main reason I bought a PS3 and not an Xbox 360 is because I can't bring myself to spend hundreds of dollars on something with a 33% failure rate.

Its pretty much everything i use on xbox +its free +it has more features so overall in my eyes. Its far more superior and more useful than my 360 is. And god forbid i have a different opinion than other people.

I have enough money for all of them b*tches!

To be honest I'm disappointed of the PS3 firmware. I mean xbox 360 features are cool but the Trophy system supposed to reward you with cool stuff (See E3 2007 Videos) instead is a Xbox 360 achievement knock-off and I don’t even use most of the xbox 360 functions anyway.

I really don’t want an achievements system on the PS3, getting my OVER NINE THOUSAND gamerscore was quite frustrating from time to time. I wouldn’t like to repeat that also that achievement whores ruin games and some developers are ridiculous with the achievements.

Anyway this is pretty pointless, people will buy a console for its games but I really don’t see why the 2.40 is a big deal, same old xbox 360 features, I rather have Home.

For me when looking at the 360, it's gotta be the:

1) Free Online
2) Reliable HW
3) Constant wave of FW updates
4) Original, fun, good-looking titles
5) Open-standards based HDD
5) USB M+K support
6) Media Centre capabilities
7) USB M+K support
8) Linux support
9) Blu-Ray - True HD Movies
10) HDMI 1.3 support
11) Bluetooth support
12) Internet browser
13) 10-year support
14) Built-in Wifi

Can't think of anymore, it's late....

Now I know 360 offers Media Centre capabilities, but Sony IMO does it better through it's interface...it's just easier/slicker....

@ Devin The only thing that was missing off of your list was the games. Its was the games the drove me to purchase my 360 and drove me to stick with it even though it has given out on me. For the most part my PS3 is used to watch movies. MGS4 pulled some of my gaming time away from the 360 but it wasn't enough to pull me away completely. lastly XBL to me is a lot more fun to play on than PSN. For the most part everybody on Live has mics unlike PSN. I for one enjoy talking to my competition and shutting up that annoying kid in the pregame lobbies. So as long as both systems puts out good and fun games I will continue to play them. Why miss out on any experiences?

Looking at just the games (all that really matters) the 360 destroys the PS3 hands down. Other than MGS4, I've yet to play anything on my PS3 that I couldn't have gotten on my 360, that is truly worth the price of the console (except maybe Pixeljunk Monsters...but that's another story). That said, I use my PS3 as my main Blu-Ray player, and it's gotten a TON of use that way, so it's easily been a good investment thus far. Looking to the future, you've got Killzone 2 (a sequel to Killzone 1, which I loathed) and Resistance 2, both of which do absolutely nothing (that they've shown so far) to pull me away from either COD4, or the upcoming Gears of War 2. Little Big Planet is easily the only exclusive coming to the PS3 this year (hopefully...) that I'll absolutely have to buy, now that I have MGS4.

None of that matters though..what matters is that this is such obvious flamebaiting that the author feels the need to attempt to somehow diffuse the fact that it's flamebait, by saying that it isn't. Switching from one console to another, if you have both consoles, is idiotic. Why wouldn't you just get the games you want on either console? It doesn't make any sense, and it's clearly just to rile people up.

When all is said and done, the thing keeping me picking the 360 version of a game over the PS3 version, has almost nothing to do with the PS3 itself. It has to do with the developers that make an inferior product for the PS3 when compared with the 360, and that can't seem to cut load times out of the equation (how about background loading as I play? Ehh?). When I have to see a 3 minute load screen EVERY time I want to jump between chapters in Metal Gear Solid 4, something is freaking broken. Fix those issues, and I'd have no problem putting my money into PS3 versions of dual release games.

Sure, the games for the 360 are great and what not, but I still always get back to this point. With only 10gb DVD capabilities the 360 soon won't be able to fit any more into its games. God knows how they managed to fit GTA IV onto DVD, I mean, the PS2 used DVDs for its games. I believe that soon Microsoft will have to make a new Xbox and many owners will get pretty annoyed that they have to buy a new one. For that reason, I belive the PS3 will be able to survive far longer with 60gb Blu-ray. In the same way that the PS2 survived for I don't know how long previously before Sony made their new console.

GTA4 managed it because there are no pre-rendered Hi-Def cutscenes like in Metal Gear Solid 4 (don't quote me on this, but I'm pretty sure they are all in-engine cut scenes). Hi-Def Pre-Rendered cut scenes are the only real advantage of the Blu-Ray disc, and when you put that up against the lower read times (which makes installs necessary) it's not a case of Blu-Ray wins, but rather, that Blu-Ray and DVD both have their strengths and weaknesses.

Personally, from my experience with MGS4, I'd much rather have interactive cut scenes (like the mission briefings with the MK II interactivity) than cut scenes that are pre-rendered, but completely static, that are the equivalent of making me watch a movie (hours and hours of movie in MGS4's case..)

Oh well, that's just my preference. Blu-Ray will be in MSofts next console for sure, but GTAIV and other games have shown that you can do a hell of a lot with good ol'DVD.