PS3 Fanboy

THIS IS SO RIGHT :

#dbronco said:

Don’t believe the hype. The PS3 has 7 processors, six that process code and 1 that sorts. The 360 has three, but they each process two streams of code at the same time. It’s not really that much of a difference. He wouldn’t tell you if Sony demanded the PS3 be the lead. And remember, this companies claim to fame is Bloodrayne…. oh and Bloodrayne 2. We will see how good they are at programming since they put themselves out there like that though.

No, that's not right. Don't try to get into technical discussions if you don't even know what a processor is. And don't cuntpaste the opinions of people like you, either.

Exactly...GTA IV although amazing as it is, could have, no wait should have been a bigger jump than it is. Processors aside the storage capacity alone on a blu-ray disc could have allowed for a much larger environment and a lot more indoor environments. Not to worry, Rockstar's secret PS3 exclusive with blow the doors off everything and give us a glimpse of what GTA might have been....

Phizzy, I don't know if it was a typo but "cuntpaste" sounds pretty dead-on to me!

Because M$ would cry like little babies.

Never seen Ghostbusters either, I take it?

Yeah, I saw Ghostbusters. When I was 7. Sorry if I'm missing a reference because I can't remember a movie from the 80s line by line.

Call of Duty 4 was made side by side with the 360 version from the ground up.

Games will look the same no matter what.

Microsoft isn't holding back the industry, the consumer is. The consumer overwhelmingly adopted the 360, for better or for worse, because it came out a year in advance and quickly established itself as a great gaming console.

The PS3, unfortunately, faltered out of the gate and is just now getting up to steam. As it stands, it has a significantly smaller install base (although that distance is shrinking every minute). The result, to make money on these big budget games, multiplats are a necessity.

On top of that, this situation is the exact reverse of last gen. PS2 games hindered the development of Xbox games because the PS2 hardware was inferior to that of the Xbox. Why? Because it released much earlier. No one dropped the PS2 because of its huge install base, but the technically superior xbox did draw attention, multiplats, and some exclusives.

Of course, the same thing is going to happen with the PS3. Eventually, the PS3 multiplats will be much better than their 360 counterparts, and developers want to take the superior PS3 hardware and make exclusives (such as the R* Exclusive, etc).

Who says it would look any better? Resistance Fall of Man is PS3 exclusive and compared to Gears of War, it sucks. Just give the dribble a rest.

Make it good the first time around . Obviously a saying that MS doesnt follow.

Surely you jest.

Don't you mean that the PS3 has a processor with 8 cores, with one reserved for redundancy? And that the 360 is a tri-core processor? And what are you talking about when you say that the 360 can run 6 processes with a life of its own?

And when you talk of slaves, surely you understand the concept of a multi-core processor?

Do you know how computer architecture works? You must be joking, because if you were serious, you would be a huge idiot.

Huge. Idiot. gb2joystiq.